Can Spousal Sexual Assault Cases be Detected without any Psychiatric Findings?

  • Kenan Karbeyaz
  • Adnan Çelikel
  • ibrahim Ortanca

Abstract

Objective: Whether spousal rape is a misconduct or not has been a controversial topic for a long time in the jurisdictional system of our country. Sexual assault against one’s spouse has been declared as a criminal act by the change in the Turkish Criminal Code on 1st June 2005. However, we think that psychiatric evaluation of the victim has been ignored by the change in the related penal code in 2014. In this study our aim is to evaluate sexual assaults in marriage and understand and present the importance of psychological findings.

Materials and Methods: Data of the sexual assault cases by one’s spouse during the six years period between 2011 and 2016 who were evaluated by Eskişehir Office of Council of Forensic Medicine were analyzed with their psychiatric evaluation findings.

Results: In 6 years 27 spousal rape victims were evaluated. Among them, 48.2 % were in the 17 to 24 years’ age group. Only two (7.4 %) had a university degree. Only one case was evaluated after the Turkish Criminal Code has changed. In only 9 (%33.3) cases, findings of the assault were observed by physical and genital examination. By psychiatric evaluation, psychiatric findings related to sexual assault has been determined in all cases. It is determined that without psychiatric evaluation, in the two third of cases no evidence would be obtained and therefore no prosecution could be conducted.

Conclusion: Without psychological findings, the sexual assault evaluation is incomplete. Therefore, the related article of penal code needs regulation. The psychiatric findings should be considered as evidence in sexual assault cases and this must be clearly defined in the Criminal Code. Units both for children and adolescents should be established in all cities immediately, in which the psychiatrists and forensic medicine specialists could work together.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Yavuz MF, Gölge ZB, Safran N. Evlilik içi zorla cinsel ilişki üzerine bir anket çalışması. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 1998; 3(2):46-50. DOI:  10.17986/blm.199832297
2. Yalvaç G. Türk Ceza Kanunu Yalvaç G (editör). Ceza ve Yargılama Hukuku Yasaları T.C. Anayasası TCK, CMK, CGTİK ve İlgili Mevzuat. Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi; 2016; s:328-74.
3. Polat O, İnanıcı MA, Aksoy ME. Cinsel Suçlar. (editörleri) Polat O, İnanıcı MA, Aksoy ME. Adli Tıp Ders Kitabı. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, 1997:s;340-60.
4. Ipekten Alaman M, Yıldız H. Domestic sexual violence and sexual problems among gynecology outpatients: an example from Turkey. Women Health. 2014;54(5):439-54.
5. Özcan NK, Günaydın S, Çitil ET. Domestic Violence Against Women In Turkey: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016;30(5):620-9.
6. Holmes MM, Resnick HS, Frampton D. Follow-up of sexual assault victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:336–342.
7. Karbeyaz K., Gündüz T, Balcı Y, Akkaya, H. Yeni Türk Ceza Kanunu sonrası değerlendirilen cinsel suç olguları; Eskişehir deneyimi. Türkiye Klinikleri Adli Tıp Derg. 2009; 6(1), 1-8.
8. Demirci Ş, Doğan HK, Erkol Z, Deniz İ. Konya’da cinsel istismar yönünden muayenesi yapılan çocuk olguların değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri Adli Tıp Derg.  2008;5(2):43-9.
9. Hwa HL, Chen SC, Wu MZ, Shun CT, Liu SK, Lee JC, Chen YC. Analysis of cases of sexual assault presenting at a medical center in Taipei. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;49(2):165-9.
10. Karbeyaz K, Gündüz T, Balcı Y, Akkaya H. Forensic psychiatric reports for victims of sexual assault and consensus problems among expertise institutes. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2012;23(4):255-62.
11. Kaya A, Aktaş EÖ. The concept of mental health deterioration in light of decisions by higher judicial bodies. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2014;25(2):133-9.
12. Puri M, Frost M, Tamang J, Lamichhane P, Shah I. The prevalence and determinants of sexual violence against young married women by husbands in rural Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2012 ;13(5):291.
13. Adhikari R, Tamang J. Sexual coercion of married women in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2010; 28:10-31
14. Frieze IH. Investigating the causes and consequences of marital rape. Signs. 1983; 8(3); 532-53.
15. McNutt LA, van Ryn M, Clark C, Fraiser I. Partner violence and medical encounters: African-American women perspectives. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19(4): 264-9.
16. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 2006;368:1260–69
17. de Visser RO, Smith AMA, Rissel CE, Richters J, Grulich AE: Sex in Australia: Experiences of sexual coercion among a representative sample of adults. Australian & New Zealand J Public Health. 2003; 27:198-203.
18. Basile KC. Prevalence of wife rape and other intimate partner sexual coercion in a nationally representative sample of women. Violence Vict. 2002;17(5):511-24.
19. Bennice JA, Resick PA. Marital rape: History, research, and practice. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2003;4(3):228-246.
20. Coker AL, Smith PH, McKeown RE, King MJ. Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: Physical, sexual, and psychological battering. Am J Public Heath. 2000;90(4), 553- 559.
21. Painter K, Farrington DP. Marital violence in Great Britain and its relationship to marital and non-marital rape. Int Rev Victimology. 1998; 5(3-4), 257-276.
22. Elnashar AM, El-Dien Ibrahim M, Eldesoky MM, Aly OM, El-Sayd Mohamed hassan M. Sexual abuse experience by married Egyptian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99(3):216–20.
23. Anes Jellali I, Jellali MA, Gataa R, Mechri A. [Violence against women in the marriage: Cross-sectional study in the family planning clinic Monastir]. Tunis Med. 2015;93(8-9):516-22. [Fransızca].
24. Günay Y, Sözen Ş, Yavuz F, Ramadanoğlu E. Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Olguları, Adli Tıp Uygulaması Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme. Adli Tıp Derg. 1996; 12:69-79.
25. Kapadia MZ, Saleem S, Karim MS. The hidden figure: sexual intimate partner violence among Pakistani women. Eur J Public Health. 2009;7:2–5.
26. Green AH. Child sexual abuse. In: Lewis M, ed. Child and Adolescent Psyhiatry. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. p.1041–48.
27. Karakaya I, Coşkun A, Ağaoğlu B, Şişmanlar ŞG, Yıldız Ö, Memik NÇ, Biçer Ü. Cinsel istismara maruz kaldığı bildirilen olguların ruhsal değerlendirme sonuçları. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2006;11(2):53–58. DOI: 10.17986/blm.2006112607
28. Danielson CK, Holmes MM Adolescent sexual assault: an update of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004 Oct;16(5):383–88.
29. Gölge ZB. Cinsel travma sonrası oluşan ruhsal sorunlar. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 2005;42(1):19–28
30. Moscarello R. Psychological management of victims of sexual assault. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1990; 35:25-30.
31. Evans E, Hawton K, Rodham K. Suicidal phenomena and abuse in adolescents: a review of epidemiological studies. Child Abuse Negl, 2005;29:45– 58.
32. Cantürk G, Cantürk N. Cinsel saldırı mağdurlarının muayene prosedürü. Turkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci 2006;2(50):49-55.
Published
29-04-2017
How to Cite
KARBEYAZ, Kenan; ÇELIKEL, Adnan; ORTANCA, ibrahim. Can Spousal Sexual Assault Cases be Detected without any Psychiatric Findings?. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine, [S.l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 40-44, apr. 2017. ISSN 2149-4533. Available at: <http://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/1064>. Date accessed: 21 july 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2017127140.
Section
Research Articles

Keywords

Sexual Assault, Turkish Penal Code, Psychological Examination