An Example Case of System Error in Evaluation of Medical Malpractice
Medical malpractice, which is defined as “patients’ harm resulting from healthcare professionals’ improper and unethical attitude or insufficient and sloppy practice”, is strictly limited to healthcare professionals’ errors in practice. However, it should include system error analysis. In this article, a missed case of system error resulted in death is presented to remind the concept to Forensic Medicine experts and review the literature.
A 20-year-old male who underwent renal transplantation from a live donor, underwent graft nephrectomy due to acute accelerated rejection. The patient with cardiac overload findings in the postoperative period, collapsed while the patient was being sent to a special center for urgent dialysis due to lack of functional dialysis unit. In the transfer ambulance, there was no oxygen source and the patient was unable to actively ventilate. The patient died while under intensive care. In our evaluation, system error has been detected and the administration was held responsible.
The experts who are asked about the medical malpractice have to take the basic concept of "medical error" as a basis for considering the mistakes of medical applications not only from the point of view of health professionals.
2. Bernstein M, Hebert PC, Etchells E. Patient safety in neurosurgery: detection of errors, prevention of errors, and disclosure of errors. Neurosurgery Quarterly. 2003;13(2):125-37.
3. Hakim RM, Lazarus JM. Initiation of dialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 1995;6(5):1319-28.
4. Clark JE, Soricelli RR. INDICATIONS FOR DIALYSIS. The Medical clinics of North America. 1965;49:1213-39.
5. Greenberg A, editor Hyperkalemia: treatment options. Seminars in Nephrology; 1998.
6. SA M. The individual, the system, and medical error. 2003.
7. Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Lockley SW, Burdick E, et al. The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Critical care medicine. 2005;33(8):1694-700.
8. Chiozza ML, Ponzetti C. FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2009;404(1):75-8.
9. Bhasale AL, Miller GC, Reid SE, Britt HC. Analysing potential harm in Australian general practice: an incident-monitoring study. Medical Journal of Australia. 1998;169(2):73-6.
10. McDonald CJ, Weiner M, Hui SL. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report. Jama. 2000;284(1):93-5.
11. Dovey S, Meyers D, Phillips R, Green L, Fryer G, Galliher J, et al. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Quality and safety in health care. 2002;11(3):233-8.
12. Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Thomas EJ, Griffey R, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Annals of emergency medicine. 2007;49(2):196-205.
13. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. Jama. 2001;286(4):415-20.
14. Landrigan CP, Rothschild JM, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Burdick E, Katz JT, et al. Effect of reducing interns' work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(18):1838-48.
15. Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M, Benson JM, Rosen AB, Schneider E, et al. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(24):1933-40.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine is an open access scientific journal. Open access means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine requires the author as the rights holder to sign and submit the journal's agreement form prior to acceptance. The authors retain copyright of their work and grant the Association for its publication. This ensures both that The Journal has the right to publish the article and that the author has confirmed various things including that it is their original work and that it is based on valid research.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
*Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.