Reliability in the Diagnosis of Personality Disorders and Criminal Responsibility

  • Derya Deniz İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Psikoloji Bölümü
Keywords: personality disorders, criminal act, criminal responsibility, forensic psychology

Abstract

The most striking aspect of the state power is the "right to punish" and the concept of "punishment" in that notion. The level of punishment is determined by the degree of intent and fault, and the level of the crime committed. The point that psychiatry assisting criminal law is whether or not the “mens rea” has taken place. The concept of "Criminal Responsibility" is clear and obvious for a mental health professional. A diagnosis about an acute or chronic mental illness can be proven in the legal sense. But the question here is not the diagnostic origin. It is to detect the functional reduction in legal or criminal responsibility. Judging from the practice of forensic psychiatry personality disorders - unlike some major mental illnesses - are generally not seen as a phenomenon that dispose criminal responsibility. Of course, criminal behavior is not merely due to personality disorders. Research findings indicate that personality disorders are caused by the interaction of environmental conditions and poorly life experiences as well as genetic vulnerability. Are these genetic factors or other factors reducing the criminal responsibility of a person? What should be discussed here is the functionality of the criteria used in the moral/mental assessment process for criminal responsibility of suspects with personality disorder. From the judicial process point of view, the most important instrument that a psychiatrist has in diagnosis is classification. Although some of them are defined by DSM IV, it is known that none of the personality disorders criteria could be fully settled today. The DSM system does not provide information on dysfunctions caused by partial diseases, so the related diagnoses can not solve judicial problems in legal cases. In such a case, how will it be decided whether the ability to comply with social norms has been reduced by personality disorders?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kocar, Y. İsnat Yeteneği, İsnat Yeteneğini Kaldıran Veya Azaltan Nedenler, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Hukuku (Ceza ve Ceza Usul Hukuku) Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2007: 35,61

Öncü F, Sercan M. Ceza Hukukunda Adli Psikiyatri. Adli Psikiyatri Uygulama Kılavuzu. (Ed. M Sercan), Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği, Ankara, 2007: 33-50

Alacakaptan, U. Suçun Unsurları, AÜHF Yayınları, No:263, Ankara, 1970: 10

Geyran PÇ, Özdemir F, Uygur N. Teşhircilikte Ceza Ehliyeti, Düşünen Adam, 1994; 7 (3): 25-29

sayılı Türk Ceza Kanunu [İnternet Mevcut adres: http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/ 1.5.5237.pdf. ; 8972, Erişim Tarihi: 20 Ocak 2017

Bayındır S. Türk ceza hukukunda akıl hastalıkları ve sonuçları, Legal Hukuk Dergisi, 2011; 9(99):17-27

Kinscherff R.Proposition: A personality disorder may nullify responsibility for a criminal act, J Law Med Ethics,2010; 38(4):745-759

Mohino S, Amadeo P, Itziar I. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility in the Spanish Supreme Court, J Forensic Sci, 2010;56 (1):150-154 DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01558.x

Kröber, HL, Lau S. Bad or mad? Personality disorders and legal responsibility- the German situation, Behav Sci Law, 2000; 18(5):679-90

Gardner DL, Lucas PB, Cowdry RW. CSF Metabolites in borderline personality disorder compared with normal controls, Biol Psychiatr, 1990;28(3):247-254 DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(90)90580-U

Brenner I. The characterological basis of multiple personality. Am J Psychoter, 1996; 50:154–166.

Stelton S, Ferraro FR. The effect of anxiety on the cognitive functioning in non- clinical schizotypal individuals, Curr Psychol, 2008; 27: 16-28 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-008-9021-2

Lymburner JA, Roesch R. Insanity defense: five years of research (1993-1997), Int J Law Psychiat, 1999; 22(3-4):213-240

Maner F, Kayatekin Z, Abay E, Saygılı S, Şener İ. Psikiyatrik Hastalıklar ve Suç, Düşünen Adam Dergisi, 1991; 4(1):6-13

Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM. Personality Disorders. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, editors. Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. 7th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:1723–1764

Ziyalar A. Erişkin Psikopatolojisi, Yüce Reklam Yayın Dağıtım A.Ş.,İstanbul, 2006:310

Öztürk MO. Ruh Sağlığı ve Bozuklukları, Yedinci Baskı, Hekimler Yayın Birliği, Ankara, 1997

Yılmaz O. Psikopati Düzeyi Yüksek Antisosyal Kişilik Bozukluğu Tanılı Olgularda Ventromedyal Prefrontal Korteksin Difüzyon Tensor Manyetik Rezonans Görüntülenmesi ve Saldırganlık Düzeyi ile İlişkisi, GATA, Haydarpaşa Eğitim Hastanesi, Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, 2012: 5-17

Ak İ, Sayar K. Antisosyal kişilik bozukluklarında sosyobiyolojik etkenler, Klinik Psikofarmokoloji Bülteni 2002;12:155-158

Kısa C, Yıldırım SG, Göka, E. Ataklık ve Ruhsal Bozukluklar, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2005; 16(1):46-54

Baykız AF. Antisosyal ve Boderline Kişilik Bozukluğu Olan Bireylerde Saldırganlık Davranışının Psikiyatrik Testlerle Değerlendirilmesi ve Biyolojik Değişkenlerle İlişkisinin Araştırılması: Kontrollü Bir Çalışma Uzmanlık Tezi, 2003:44-56

Konuk N, Kökrek Z, Karadeniz H. Adli Psikiyatrik Uygulamalarda Tanı Geçerliği Kavramı, Türkiye Klinikleri Dergisi, Psychiatry- Special Topics, 2011;4(1):52-59

Frances AJ. Foreword. In J.Z. Sadler, O.P. Wiggins & M.A. Schwartz (Eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Psychiatric Diagnostic Classification. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994

Regier DA, Former ME, Rae DS, Locks BZ, Keith SJ, Judd LL, Goodwin FK. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse results from ECA Study, JAMA, 1990, 264:2511-2518

Trull, TJ, Sher KJ, Minks-Brown C, Durbin J. Borderline personality disorder and substance use disorders: A review and integration, Clinical Psychology Review, 2000; 20:235-253

Yaluğ İ, Kocabaşoğlu N, Aydoğan G, Günel B. Obsesif Kompulsif Bozukluk ve Panik Bozuklukta Depresyon ve Kişilik Bozukluğu Komorbiditesi, Düşünen Adam Dergisi, 2003;16 (1):28-34

Deniz D. Suça Karışan Bireylerde Dissosiyatif Yaşantılar ve Çocukluk Çağı Travmalarının Sıklığı, İstanbul Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, 2015: 98

Published
2017-08-04
How to Cite
Deniz, D. (2017). Reliability in the Diagnosis of Personality Disorders and Criminal Responsibility. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine, 22(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2017228029
Section
Reviews