A Hard-to-Detect Signature Forgery Method “Freehand Simulation”: Case Report

  • Güven Seçkin Kırcı Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon
  • Halil İlhan Aydoğdu Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon
  • Hasan Okumuş Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon
  • Erdal Özer Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon
  • Ahmet Eryılmaz Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, İstanbul
  • İsmail Birincioğlu Balıkesir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Balıkesir
Keywords: freehand simulation, signature forgery, questioned document

Abstract

Background: Signature is defined as any kind of distinctive mark which assures the identity of its generator in a certain way while demonstrating the generator’s will for approval of the content of the document to which it is subscribed, not limited to those generated with a person’s handwriting, Forged signatures, that is, the signatures not generated by its owner himself on the related document, can be produced by various methods. Those methods can be listed as tracing, freehand simulation using a model, freehand simulation from memory, revenue stamp transferring, photocopying or computer assisted reproduction techniques and fabricating on behalf of imaginary identities. Generation via signature machines, a recently invented way gradually becoming more frequent, can be added to this list. Freehand simulation from memory is distinguished from other afore-mentioned methods in certain aspects. Simulator studies the genuine signature carefully for days, learns its all features by heart, make trials of generation and finally executes the simulation in one move when convinced for success. This method is the hardest to reveal for examiners with its distinct features.

Case: In our case, the signature subject to forgery investigation and the signatures obtained for comparison were found to be similar in signature characteristics such as signature velocity, dysfluency (jerk), slant and pen pressure. With a more detailed examination, it is understood that signatures are far different regarding start and stop points, stroke settings and counts, upstroke and down stroke patterns. Considering those findings, it is inferred that signature subject to investigation is generated by simulation using freehand method by memory.

Conclusions: In this study, a forgery case relatively hard to detect is presented with sample images with the aim to emphasize acting in a very sensitive manner and asking for experienced specialist view for such cases is a must.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Türk Dil Kurumu Türkçe Sözlük, Ankara, 1988.

Akın, S. G. Adli Grafolojide Sağlıklı Mukayese Belge Temininin Esasları, İstanbul Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul 2001, s: 21,

http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.3.2525.pdf (Erişim tarihi 08.03.2016)

Bafra, J. İmza Yazı ve Adli Belge İncelemeleri, 1. Baskı, Ufuk Matbaası, İstanbul

, s.73

Birincioğlu İ, Alkan N., Kurtaş Ö. ve ark. “Serbest taklit yöntemiyle oluşturulmuş bir imza sahteciliği: olgu sunumu.” Yıllık Adli Tıp Toplantıları 2001 Kitabı. İstanbul, 2001.

Baysan GY, Dreyfus Davası: Gerçek ve Adalet Savaşçısı Zola, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2002; 19(1); 181-195

Mohammed L, Found B, Rogers D, Frequency of Signature Styles in San Diego County, Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, 2008; 11(1); p12-14

İplikçi Ş, El Yazıları ve İmzaların Kriminal Yönden İncelenmesi, 1. Baskı, Marki Ofset, İstanbul, 2011, s;29-100.

Birincioğlu İ, Özkara E, Adli Belge İncelemelerinde Bilinmeyenler, Örneklerle Yazı ve İmza Analizi ile Islak İmza Kavramı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2010;87;403-33.

Aşıcıoğlu F (Editör), Adli Belge İncelemesi, 1. Baskı, Beta Basım A.Ş. İstanbul, 2005, 31-33,61

Taşdemir K. Belgelerde Sahtecilik Suçları. 1. Baskı, Ertem Basım Ltd. Şti, Ankara, 2013, s: 18-9.

Hilton, O. Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, USA, CRC Press

LLC, 1993:183-6.

Aşıcıoğlu, F. (Editör), Adli Bilimlerde El Yazısı ve İmza İncelemeleri, Öner

Matbaacılık, İstanbul 2007, s. 151-3.

Levinson, J. Questioned Documents A Lawyer’s Handbook, Academic Press, Londra, 2001, s:49.

Kurtaş Ö. Adli Tıp Açısından Grafolojinin Önemi. Adalet Bakanlığı Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı Uzmanlık Tezi, İstanbul 1992, s: 77,

Kandemir, K. İstemli Olarak Değiştirilen İmzalardaki Kalıcı Unsurlar, İ.Ü. Adli Tıp Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul 2001, s:1.

Slyter, S. A. Forensic Signature Examination, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Illinois, USA. 1995, s:36-7

Ellen, D. The Scientific Examination of Documents Methods and Techniques,

Second Edition, Taylor-Francis Ltd, Londra, 1997, s: 35.

Asicioglu F, Turan N, Handwriting changes under the effect of alcohol, Forensic Science International, Volume 132/3, 2003, s: 201-210

Published
2017-06-04
How to Cite
Kırcı, G., Aydoğdu, H., Okumuş, H., Özer, E., Eryılmaz, A., & Birincioğlu, İsmail. (2017). A Hard-to-Detect Signature Forgery Method “Freehand Simulation”: Case Report. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine, 23(1), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2017227928
Section
Case Reports