Retrospective Evaluation of Disability Reports In Çukurova University Forensic Medicine Department
Objective: Disability; is defined as disablement. Disability, a word in Arabic origin, is derived from the word “malady” which means disablement, illness, unstable condition. The loss of function, due to injuries or occupational reasons, which does not improve and continue in a sequential manner despite all the treatments applied is defined as disability and the disability rate—profit loss rate in profession—is determined as the rate determined by using prepared scales—determining the loss amount of the whole body compared to the earning power in the profession. In this study, it was aimed that, revealing the contents of and results of disability reports and discussing results in the light of literature.
Materials and Methods: Disability reports sent by courts to Çukurova University Forensic Medicine Department between the dates of 01.01.2013 and 30.06.2016, whom claimed maimed after traffic accidents and other causes like work accidents, examined retrospectively.
Results: In total, 3835 disability files submitted by courts were included in the study. There were 2892 male (75.4%) and 943 (24.6%) female cases. The age range was between 1–79 years and it was observed that most of the cases were in the 30-39 age group. 3768 (98.3%) of the cases were injured due to traffic accidents and 67 (1.7%) were injured due to incidents rather than traffic accidents. The average rate of disability was 17.7%. The highest disability rate range was found to be in the 10-19.9 percent group. Of the cases, 587 (15.3%) were found not to have a reduction in earning power in the profession. During the calculation of the disability reports, 833 (21.7%) cases were found to be appraised because there was no item meeting the restriction.
Conclusion: It is believed that forensic medicine specialists often fail to provide a standard practice in disability reports. In order to achieve this standardization, it is necessary to increase the number of collaborations. In terms of helping to ensure justice, we think that each of the regulations used in the disability calculation alone is inadequate for which reason it is necessary to establish a new regulation which includes more detailed, current professions.
2. Birgen N, Okudan M, İnanıcı MA, Okyay M. İş kazasına bağlı olgularda maluliyet oranı hesaplanması: adli tıp açısından değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni, 1999;4(3):101-8. DOİ: 10.17986/blm.199943374.
3. Ünal V, Baklacıoğlu F, Özgün Ünal E, Çetinkaya Z, Demir Muhammet, Çağdır AS. Beden çalışma gücü kaybı değerlendirilen olgularda kurumlar arası karşılaştırma. Adli Tıp Bülteni, 2016; 21(1): 8-15. DOİ: 10.17986/blm.2016116594.
4. Ünal V, Özgün Ünal E, Yener Z, Çetinkaya Z, Çağdır S. Fark hesabına dayalı maluliyet oranı tespiti. Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2015; 12(2): 37-46. DOİ: 10.5505/adlitip.2015.08870
5. Ünal V, Yurtseven A, Erdoğan M, Anolay N, Özgün Ünal E, Baklacıoğlu F. Travma sonrası meydana gelen alt ekstremite ampütasyonlarında etyoloji ve maluliyet değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni, 2016; 21(1):31-38. DOİ: 10.17986/blm.2016116598.
6. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Karayolu Trafik Kaza İstatistikleri, 2015 http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=21611 (Erişim Tarihi: 13.06.2017).
7. Eşiyok B, Korkusuz İ. Yaşlılarda Travmaya Bağlı Maluliyet. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2006; 9(4):213-217.
8. Ertürk S, Ege B, Yemişcigil A, Aktaş EÖ. Maluliyet Oranları Saptanan Olguların Özellikleri. 1. Ulusal Adli Tıp Kongresi (1-4 Kasım 1994 İstanbul) Poster Sunuları Kitabı. İstanbul; 1998:139-42.
9. Kaya A, Meral O, Erdoğan N, Aktaş E. Ö. Maluliyet Raporlarının Düzenlenmesi: Anabilim Dalımıza Başvuran Olgu Özellikleri. Adli Tıp Bülteni, 2015;20(3):144-151. DOİ: 10.17986/blm.2015314259.
10. Dirlik M, Çakır Bostancıoğlu B, Elbek T, Korkmaz B, Çallak Kallem F, Gün B, Features of the traffic accidents happened in the province of Aydın between 2005 and 2011. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20(5):353-8.
11. Yavuz MS, Özgüner IF. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Acil Servisi'ne 1999-2001 Yılları Arasında Müracaat Eden Adli Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2003; 17: 47-5.
12. Güven FMK, Bütün C, Beyaztaş Y, Eren ŞH, Korkmaz İ. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesine Başvuran Adli Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. ADÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 10: 23-8.
13. Varol O, Eren ŞH, Oğuztürk H, Korkmaz İ, Beydilli İ. Acil Servise trafik kazası sonucu başvuran hastaların İncelenmesi. CÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;28(2):55-60
14. Bilgin UE, Meral O, Koçak A, Aktaş EÖ, Kıyan S, Altuncı YA. 2011 yılında trafik kazası sonucu Ege Üniversitesi Hastanesi Acil Servisine başvuran hastaların adli tıbbi boyutuyla incelenmesi. Ege Tıp Dergisi. 2013;52(2):93-99.
15. Koçak S, Uçar K, Bayır A, Ertekin B. Acil servise başvuran motorsiklet ve bisiklet kazası olgularının karakteristikleri. Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi. 2010;10(3):112-118.
16. Gürol Cantürk, Burcu Eşiyok, Hacer Yapar, Bülent Doğan, Hamit Hancı. İş kazası nedeniyle 1993-2003 yılları arasında AÜTF Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalına başvuran olguların değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi. 28 (1) 001-006, 2006.
17. Hilal A. Maluliyet Hesaplamalarında Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Adli Tıp Bülteni, 2016; 21(2). DOİ: 10.17986/blm.2016220387
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine is an open access scientific journal. Open access means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine requires the author as the rights holder to sign and submit the journal's agreement form prior to acceptance. The authors retain copyright of their work and grant the Association for its publication. This ensures both that The Journal has the right to publish the article and that the author has confirmed various things including that it is their original work and that it is based on valid research.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
*Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.