The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
The Perspective of the Court of Cassation and the Problems Concerning the Expert System in the Light of the Relevant Judgements
Corresponding Author : Gökhan Karaburun
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine,
Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017)
Although the experts and the expert system are tools for assessing the evidence which directly affects “the right to fair trial”, it has become one of the major problems of the judiciary system since it has not been institutionalized yet.
Even though the Law No: 6754 on Expert Report has been an important step towards institutionalization of the expert system, the main tool for judicial review in this field is, for sure, the judgments of the high courts.
This article elaborates on the perspective of the Court of Cassation (CoC) regarding the expert system and legal status of the experts considering the criteria used in the judgments of the Court of Cassation, principles described by the Law No: 6754 and relevant regulation and various solutions occurred in practice.
Download CitationEndnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
- Demirkapı E. Anglo-Amerikan hukukunda bilirkişilik kurumunda yeni eğilimler
- Sayıcı B. Türkiye’de hukuk ve adli bilimler açısından imza ve karşılaşılan sorunlar, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
- Demirkapı E. Anglo-Amerikan Hukukunda Bilirkişilik Kurumunda Yeni Eğilimler. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;5(2):39-75
- Aşçıoğlu Ç. Bilirkişilik Kavramı ve Görev Sınırları, Bildiri, Barolar Birliği Bilirkişilik Sempozyumu 2001