Standardized Postmortem Forensic Examination Form

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1382

Keywords:

Adli Ölü Muayenesi, Ölüm sonrası değişiklikler, Ölüm zamanı

Abstract

Objective: For the investigation of unnatural deaths all findings such as signs of injury, time and cause of death must be detected during the examination of the body. It is known that these examinations, which must be primarily carried out by forensic medicine specialists, are also carried out by general practitioners. In this study, it was aimed to build up a standardized form to give guidance to the physicians attending the postmortem examinations.

Material and method: While creating the postmortem forensic examination form, the general forensic examination report form used in the field was taken as an example. The form was constructed with the sections of identification, postmortem findings, injury related lesions, and determination of the cause of death. Body diagrams to mark the lesions are also added.

Discussion: It is known that a certain standardization is provided by the general forensic examination report forms in forensic cases. However, there is no such standardized form being used in our country. As the time interval prolonged between postmortem examination and autopsy, postmortem findings may change. For this reason, the findings during the postmortem examination must be defined and recorded in complete accuracy. Any deficiency or inaccuracy happened in this process could impede the course of justice. It is anticipated that by the usage of the form prepared for the requirements of physicians who carry out the postmortem examination, deficiencies in the practice can be reduced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Madea B, Argo A. Certificatoin of Death: External Postmortem Exmination. In: Madea B, editor. Handbook of Forensic Medicine2014. p. 57-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118570654.ch6

Koç S CM. Birinci Basamakta Adli Tıp2010. 18-37 p.

Genel Adli Muayene Raporu https://dosyaism.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/26519,geneladlimuayeneraporudoc.doc?0. Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2020

Adli Tıp Hizmet Modeli ve İnsan Gücü Planlaması. Adana; 2007.

Katkıcı U. Sivas’ta Adli Otopsiler (1990-1995): Demografik Veriler ve Otopsiyi Yapan Hekimin Özellikleri. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 1997;2(1):3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.199721195

Kumral B, Özdeş T. Tekirdağ İlindeki Hekimlerin Adli Tıp Uygulamalarına Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2013;28(2). https://doi.org/10.5505/adlitip.2014.76376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/adlitip.2014.76376

Şengül HM, Ergönen AT. İzmir'de Yapılan Adli Otopsilerde Kadın Ölümlerinin Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi ve Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Araştırılması. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;31(2):87-96.

Karger B, Lorin de la Grandmaison G, Bajanowski T, Brinkmann B. Analysis of 155 consecutive forensic exhumations with emphasis on undetected homicides. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2004;118(2):90-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-003-0426-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-003-0426-z

Minelli N, Marchetti D. Discrepancies in Death Certificates, Public Health Registries, and Judicial Determinations in Italy. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(3):705-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12114

Parai JL, Kreiger N, Tomlinson G, Adlaf EM. The Validity of the Certification of Manner of Death by Ontario Coroners. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16(11):805-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.01.006

Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F. Discrepancies Between Clinical and Postmortem Diagnoses in Criticallyill Patients: an Observational Study. Crit Care. 2003;7(6):R129-R32. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2359

Ravakhah K. Death Certificates are not Reliable: Revivification of the Autopsy. South Med J. 2006;99(7):728-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.smj.0000224337.77074.57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.smj.0000224337.77074.57

Winkel BG, Holst AG, Theilade J, Kristensen IB, Thomsen JL, Hougen HP, et al. Differences in Investigations of Sudden Unexpected Deaths in Young People in a NationwideSetting. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126(2):223-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0602-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0602-5

Ulusal Çekirdek Eğitim Programı-2014. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Ulusal-cekirdek-egitimi-programlari/tip_fakultesi_cep.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2020

Zeybek V, Acar K, Dereli AK, Kara CO. Yapılandırılmış Senaryo Eşliğinde Maket Üzerinde Adli Ölü Muayenesi Eğitiminin Değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2018;23(1). https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2018136913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2018136913

Madea B, Henssge C, Reibe S, Tsokos M, Kernbach-Wighton G. Postmortem Changesand Time Since Death. In: Madea B, editor. Handbook of Forensic Medicine2014. p. 75-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118570654.ch7

Balci Y, Basmak H, Kocaturk BK, Sahin A, Ozdamar K. The importance of measuring intraocular pressureusing a tonometer in order to estimate the postmortem interval. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31(2):151-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181dd7933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181dd7933

Dokgoz H, Arican N, Elmas I, Fincanci SK. Comparison of morphological changes in white blood cells after death and invitro storage of blood for the estimation of postmortem interval. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;124(1):25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00559-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00559-X

Forger LV, Woolf MS, Simmons TL, Swall JL, Singh B. A eukaryotic community succession based method for postmortem interval (PMI) estimation of decomposing porcineremains. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;302:109838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.054

Madea B. Is there recent progress in the estimation of the postmortem interval by means of than atochemistry? Forensic Sci Int. 2005;151(2-3):139-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.01.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.01.013

Nolan AN, Mead RJ, Maker G, Bringans S, Speers SJ. The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Production of Peptides in Mammalian Decomposition Fluid in Relation to the Estimation of Post-mortem Interval: A Summer/Winter Comparison in Western Australia. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;303:109957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109957

Wang H, Ma J, Xu H, Lyu Y, Tao L, Li W, et al. Early Postmortem Interval (EPMI) Estimation Using Differentially Expressed Gene Transcripts. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019;38:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.04.008

Aydin B, Colak B, Balci Y, Demirustu C. Consistency of postmortem interval estimations of physicians using only postmortem changes of putrefied dead bodies. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31(3):243-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181ee01d9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181ee01d9

Akar T, Bakar C, Şenol E, Demirel B. Gazi Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Gazi Hastanesinde Adli Ölü Muayenesi Yapılan Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Tıp Dergisi. 2005;16(4):169-71.

Yağmur F, Din H. Kayseri İlinde 2007 Yılında Adli Ölü Muayenesi ve Otopsileri Yapılan Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2009;23(2):18-24.

Altun G, Azmak D, Yılmaz A, Yılmaz G. Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Acil Servisine Başvuran Adli Olguların Özellikleri. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 1997;2(2):62-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.199722226

Korkmaz T, Kahramansoy N, Erkol Z, Sarıçil F, Kılıç A. Acil Servise Başvuran Adli Olguların ve Düzenlenen Adli Raporların Değerlendirilmesi. Haseki Tıp Bülteni. 2012(50):14-20.

İlçe A, Erkol MH, Alpteker H, Erkol ZZ. Bolu İl Merkezinde Acil Servise Başvuran Adli Olguların Raporlarının Retrospektif İncelenmesi. Abant Tıp Dergisi. 2018;7(3):68-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/abantmedj.2018.31957

Downloads

Published

2021-04-01

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

1.
polat M Önder, Meriç Çağdaş, Altun G. Standardized Postmortem Forensic Examination Form. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2021 Apr. 1 [cited 2025 Sep. 6];26(1):46-55. Available from: https://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/1382