Adaptation of the eyewitness metamemory scale into Turkish: a validity and reliability study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1742

Keywords:

Eyewitness memory, metamemory, memory, scale adaptation

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to adapt the Eyewitness Testimony Metamemory Scale into the Turkish language and to assess its validity and reliability for use in Turkish-speaking communities. The scale was developed to measure individuals’ awareness of their memory capacity for eyewitness accounts.

Methods: The study recruited 201 participants. Statistical methods including exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess the construct validity of the scale. Cronbach alpha coefficient was calculated to assess the reliability of the scale. The original Eyewitness Metamemory Scale was translated into Turkish and culturally adapted following rigorous methodological guidelines.

Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the construct validity of the scale was robust. In addition, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient showed that the scale had a high level of internal consistency. These results support that the Turkish version of the Eyewitness Metamemory Scale is a psychometrically reliable and valid measurement tool.

Conclusion: The Turkish Eyewitness Metamemory Scale has been evaluated as an appropriate and reliable tool for assessing individuals’ memory awareness in eyewitnessing contexts in Turkey. This scale provides an important tool for both research and practical applications. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Aylin Aydın, İstanbul Nişantaşı Üniversitesi, Istanbul Nisantasi University

    Aylin AYDIN is an Instructor at Istanbul Nisantasi University and a PhD candidate in Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Institute of Forensic Sciences and Legal Medicine, Department of Social Sciences, Psychotraumatology and Psychohistory Research Unit. Her research primarily focuses on language education, learning, memory and trauma. 

References

Hervé HF, Cooper BS, Yuille JC. Biopsychosocial perspectives on memory variability in eyewitnesses. In: Cooper BS, Griesel D, Ternes M, editors. Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment. Springer; 2013;23-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9

Wixted JT, Mickes L, Fisher RP. Rethinking the reliability of eyewitness memory. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(3):324-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617734878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617734878

Dunlosky J, Bjork RA. The integrated nature of metamemory and memory. In: Dunlosky J, Bjork RA, editors. Handbook of metamemory and memory. New York: Psychology Press; 2008:11-28.

Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am Psychol. 1979;34(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906

Saraiva RB. The role of metamemory in eyewitness testimony. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/jgn43

Wixted JT. Time to exonerate eyewitness memory. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;292:e13-e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.018

Loftus EF. Eyewitness testimony: psychological research and legal thought. Crime Justice. 1981;3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/449078

Alpar G, Er N, Uçar Boyraz F. Görgü tanıklığında bellek hataları: olay sonrası bilginin ve tuzak soruların hatırlama ve kaynak izleme üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2007;10(20):1-17.

Tekin S. Görgü tanıklığı: olay sonrası yanlış bilgide kategori faktörünün etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Enstitüsü; 2009.

Saraiva RB, van Boeijen I, Hope L, Horselenberg R, Sauerland M, van Koppen PJ. Eyewitness metamemory predicts identification performance in biased and unbiased line-ups. Legal Criminol Psychol. 2020;25(2):111-32. https://doi:10.1111/lcrp.12165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12166

Seyrekbasan A. Kadınlarda görgü tanıklığı bellek hataları: tanık olunan olay sonrası bağımsız bellek bildiriminin sürpriz tanıma testi ile ilişkisi [yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi; 2014.

Hollins TJ, Weber N. Monitoring and regulation of accuracy in eyewitness memory: Time to get some control. In: Dunlosky J, Bjork RA, editors. The Oxford handbook of metamemory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016:171-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.22

Kurdoğlu Ersoy P. Görgü tanığı belleği araştırmaları ve yasal uygulamalar: tarihsel bir bakış. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi. 2018;2(4):271-9. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.472700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.472700

Saraiva RB, van Boeijen IM, Hope L, Horselenberg R, Sauerland M, van Koppen P. Development and validation of the eyewitness metamemory scale. 2019. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mjfea DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mjfea

Brislin RW, Freimanis C. Back-translation. An Encyclopaedia of Translation: Chinese-English, English-Chinese. 2001:22.

Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kline TJ. Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications; 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385693

Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238

Metcalfe J, Dunlosky J. Metamemory. In: Roediger HL III, editor. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 2008. p. 349-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00159-5

Shapira AA, Pansky A. Cognitive and metacognitive determinants of eyewitness memory accuracy over time. Metacognition Learn. 2019;14:437-61. https://doi:10.1007/s11409-019-09206-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09206-7

Göz İ, Tekin S, Dinn AA. Görgü tanıklığında olay sonrası yanlış bilginin etkisi kategori kuvvetine göre değişir mi? Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 2015;30(75):36.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Aydın A. Adaptation of the eyewitness metamemory scale into Turkish: a validity and reliability study. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 30 [cited 2025 Sep. 6];30(2):90-7. Available from: https://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/1742