Postgraduate theses in forensic dentistry in Türkiye: a methodological evaluation

Authors

  • Burcu Duman Serbest Diş hekimi , Serbest Diş hekimi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1752

Keywords:

Postgraduate Education, Thesis, Forensic Sciences, Dentistry, Forensic Odontology

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the methodological status of postgraduate theses in forensic dentistry in Türkiye. Since there is no comprehensive evaluation of this field in the literature, the research fills an important gap.

Methods: Theses completed between 1999 and 2025 were retrieved from the Turkish National Thesis Center (www.tez.yok.gov.tr) using the keywords “Forensic Dentistry,” “Forensic Odontology,” “Forensic Sciences and Dentistry,” and “Forensic Medicine and Dentistry.” Data were analyzed through frequency distributions and Chi-square tests.

Results: A total of 41 theses were evaluated: 7 master’s, 16 doctoral, 16 dentistry specialization, and 2 medical specialization. The highest output was in 2022 (19.5%). Most studies were conducted in state universities (92.7%), with a smaller proportion in private institutions (7.3%). Female researchers (58.5%) contributed more than males. Professors dominated supervisory roles (61%). Radiographic identification methods were the most common topic (46.3%), while AI-based and legal studies remained limited (9.8%). Laboratory-based research (31.7%) was the most frequent design.

Conclusion: Postgraduate studies in forensic dentistry in Türkiye lack methodological diversity, show limited adoption of innovative techniques (9.8%), and are regionally concentrated (46.3% in Central Anatolia). Interdisciplinary collaborations and methodological training are recommended to overcome these limitations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balachander N, Babu NA, Jimson S, Priyadharsini C, Masthan K: Evolution of Forensic Odontology: An Overview. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2015;7(Suppl 1): S176–S180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155894

Karaman F: Adli Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;30(3):492–498. https://doi.org/10.17567/Ataunidfd.566892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.566892

Okkesim A, Mısırlıoğlu M, Adışen MZ, Akyıl YY: Adli Bilimlerde Diş Hekimliğinin Yeri. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2018;9(4):1593–1600.

Dutta SR, Singh P, Passi D, Varghese D, Sharma S: The Role of Dentistry İn Disaster Management and Victim İdentification: An Overview of Challenges İn Indo-Nepal Scenario. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2016;15(3):442–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12663-016-0896-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0896-4

Demir AI. Türk Toplumunda Diş ve Diş Çevre Dokularına Ait Durumların Adli Kimliklendirmedeki Belirleyiciliğinin Karşılaştırılması [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi; 2018.

Singh NN, Gowhar O, Ain TS, Sultan S: Exploring Trends In Forensic Odontology. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2014;8(5):ZC28. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9976.5273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9976.5273

Sassouni V: Dentofacial Radiography İn Forensic Dentistry. Journal of Dental Research. 1963;42(1):274–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420012901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420012901

Luntz LL: History of Forensic Dentistry. Dental Clinics of North America. 1977;21(1):7–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00887-4

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers [Internet]. Version 2. London: COPE; 2017 [Cited 2025 Jun 24]. Available From: https://doi.org/10.24318/Cope.2019.1.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9

Booth WC, Colomb GG, Williams JM. The Craft of Research. 3rd Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009.

Aydoğdu Hİ: Yapay Zekâ ve Adli Bilimler: Yayınların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2023;28(2):224–228. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1661

Zeybek V, Karabağ G, Yavuz MS: Türkiye’den Adli Tıp Alanında Yapılmış Yayınların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2022;27(3):218-224. https://doi.org/10.17986/Blm.1587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1587

Öner BS, Kara M, Orbay M: Adli Tıp Alanında Türkiye Adresli Yayınların 2011-2020 Dönemi İçin Bibliyometrik Analizi. 2021;26(2):79-88.

İğde EN, Alemdar MZ, Akçan R: Felaket Kurbanlarının Kimliklendirilmesi Üzerine Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2024;29(1). https://doi.org/10.17986/Blm.1684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1684

Interpol. Disaster Victim İdentification (DVI) [Internet]. Interpol; [Cited 2025 Apr 17]. Available From: https://Www.İnterpol.İnt/How-We-Work/Forensics/Disaster-Victim-Identification-DVI

Çınar MA, Turhan B, Badat T, Bayramlar K, Yakut Y: Türkiye’de Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Alanında Yapılan Doktora Tezlerinin Tematik ve Metodolojik Açıdan İncelenmesi Araştırma Makalesi. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2021;32(2):87-94. https://doi.Org/10.21653/Tjpr.824330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.824330

Güler Ç, Alper ES: Türkiye’de Pedodonti (Çocuk Diş Hekimliği) Lisansüstü Eğitiminde Tamamlanan Tezlerin İncelenmesi: Metodolojik Bir Çalışma. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2024;33(1):257-263. https://doi.org/10.34108/Eujhs.1406796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.1406796

T. S. Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Odontology. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences. 2021;13(1):1-2. https://L24.İm/Ftemd

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Duman B. Postgraduate theses in forensic dentistry in Türkiye: a methodological evaluation. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 30 [cited 2025 Sep. 6];30(2):131-6. Available from: https://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/1752