The role of fractures and dislocations and the recognition of traumatic findings in classical Ottoman medicine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1747Keywords:
Fracture, Dislocation, Forensic Medicine, Ottoman EraAbstract
Objective: In our study, we aim to contribute to the fields of Medical History and Forensic Medicine by comparatively analyzing the descriptions of bone fractures and dislocations, their mechanisms, and healing durations found in Ottoman-era medical texts.
Methods: For this study, 93 Ottoman-era medical books were examined as sources. Among the examined books, two were identified as containing information on fractures and dislocations that are significant from a forensic medical perspective.
Results: Some general descriptions related to fractures in these works include statements such as: “If the bone has not shifted, no sound is produced, and there is no pain during examination; in this case, the bone is not fractured but rather bruised, cracked, or slightly split.” The causes of fractures are described as resulting from falling from a height, being struck by wood, stone, flat arrows, swords, cannonballs, muskets, or from other similar impacts. Although modern medicine recognizes numerous factors influencing bone healing times, these historical texts mention that the healing period for a femur fracture is 50 days. Regarding dislocations, it is stated that elbow dislocations do not occur with minor force and are difficult to reposition, while various other details relevant to forensic medicine are provided for other types of dislocations.
Conclusion: The examination of these sources reveals that Ottoman medical scholars possessed considerable knowledge regarding fractures and dislocations. These findings provide insight into the knowledge and practices of Ottoman-era physicians in the context of trauma and forensic evaluation.
Downloads
References
Dokgöz H, Koçak U. Adli Bilimler. İçinde: Adli Tıp ve Adli Bilimler. 1. bs Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2019. s. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.1
Mandacı Uncu E. Eski Mezopotamya’da Tıp. History Studies International Journal of History. 2013;5(5):107-18. https://doi.org/10.9737/historyS1034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9737/historyS1034
Kılıç Y, Erdem F. Eski Mezopotamya Hukûku’nda Meslekî Suçlara Verilen Cezalar. Akademik Tarih Ve Düşünce Dergisi. 2015;2(7):1-30.
Tosun M. Hammurabi’nin Toprak Kanunları. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 1963;21(3-4):127-41.
Bilgiç E. Eski Mezopotamya Kavimlerinde Kanun Anlayışı ve An’anesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Ocak 1963;21(3-4):103-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Dtcfder_0000000497
Masalcı Şahin G. Hitit Yasalarında Kadının Yeri. Bartın Üniversitesi Çeşm-i Cihan Tarih Kültür Ve Sanat Araştırmaları E-Dergisi. 2017;4(2):134-43. https://doi.org/10.30804/cesmicihan.359630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30804/cesmicihan.359630
Savaş A. Hitit, Roma, İslam ve Yahudi Hukukları Üzerine Mukayeseli Bir Çalışma. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2011;(18):243-74.
Ayışın S. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Bilirkişilik (İstanbul Örneği) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. İstanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Adli Tıp ve Adli Bilimler Enstitüsü; 2019. Erişim adresi: https://nek.istanbul.edu.tr/ekos/TEZ/61203.pdf
Sarban S, Aksoy S, Uzel I, Işikan UE, Atik S. Orthopaedic techniques of Sabuncuoğlu in the 15th century Ottoman period. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.2005; 439:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000180894.12451.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000180894.12451.30
Gürlek M. Alâ’im-i Cerrahin, Cerrâh-nâme İbrahim bin Abdullah. 1. bs. İstanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı; 2016. 1066 s.
Keskinbora HK, İnce. Ebü’l-Kâsım ez-Zehrâvî ile Şerefeddin Sabuncuoğlu’nun Eserlerinin Benzerliği Var mı? İstanbul University Press; 2021. s. 283-95. https://doi.org/10.26650/PB/AA08.2023.002.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/PB/AA08.2023.002.022
Sabuncuoğlu Ş. Cerrahiyetü’l- Haniyye. 2. bs. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu; 2020. 495 s.
Özkaya H. Arap Harfli Türkçe Tıp Yazmaları Çalışmalarında Derleme Sözlüğü’nden Faydalanmak. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;(Özel Sayı 4):179-91. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.454262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.454262
Tanrıkulu S, Gönen E. Kırık iyileşmesi. Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği Derg. 2017;16(6):455-75. https://doi.org/10.14292/totbid.dergisi.2017.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14292/totbid.dergisi.2017.62
Kılıçoğlu SS. Mikroskobi Düzeyinde Kırık İyileşmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2002;55(2):143-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000021
Sermet Koç, Can M. Birinci Basamakta Adli Tıp. İstanbul: İstanbul Tabip Odası; 2010. 286 s.
Ataç A, İnce F. Milli Kütüphane’de Bulunan Eski Harfli Türkçe Tıp Kitapları. Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2022. 263 s. https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.1585
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zehra Aslan Aydoğdu- Ayten Altıntaş
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
