Abstract
This study aims to explore the intersection of forensic medicine and art by examining ethical and aesthetic representations through digital production methods. Themes of trauma, death, and the body in classical and contemporary art were analyzed. Five original digital models (AJ–1–AJ–5) were created using AI-assisted 3D modeling, light mapping, and data-based anatomy visualization. The models demonstrated high compliance with forensic observation standards and ethical representation principles. No real anatomical data were used; trauma, fractures, and postmortem changes were symbolically depicted. The “Anatomy and Justice” project proposes an original digital model for the ethical and artistic representation of forensic knowledge. Digital art may serve as a valuable tool for forensic education and ethical awareness.
References
Chao TC. Early forensic medicine in China: The Hsi Yuan Lu and its influence. Forensic Sci Int. 1988;37(3):167–175. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(88)90016-0
Vesalius A. De Humani Corporis Fabrica. Basel: Oporinus; 1543. ISBN: 9781594621934.
Sawday J. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge; 1995. ISBN: 9780415120632.
Jones R. Leonardo da Vinci: Anatomist. J R Soc Med. 2012;105(12):503–508. PMID: 23264576.
Kemp M. Leonardo da Vinci – The Marvelous Works of Nature and Man. Oxford University Press; 2006. ISBN: 9780199299027.
Tumay S, Sayar S. Adli Tıp Fotoğrafının Estetik Boyutları. Türkiye Klinikleri Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2017;14(2):47–54. Available from: https://www.turkiyeklinikleri.com/article/tr-adli-tip-fotografinin-estetik-boyutlari-80430.html
Hulathduwa SR. Forensic medicine: A synopsis of the past, present and a glimpse into the future scenarios. J Adv Med Med Res. 2021;33(12):69–78. doi:10.9734/jammr/2021/v33i1230977
Oğuz P, Güngör K. History of forensic medicine in Turkey. Legal Med. 2009;11(Suppl 1):S2–S6. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.004
Çağdır AS, Yazıcı YA. Adli Tıp ve Sanat. Dirim Dergisi. 2003;6:26–30.
Fernández A. Goya’s depiction of execution and death: The Third of May 1808. Art Hist J. 2019;42(2):151–166.
Kemp M. Caravaggio and the anatomical image. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2001;56(3):216–231. doi:10.1093/jhmas/56.3.216
Vesalius A, da Vinci L. Anatomy and the Artist. Jones R (ed). Oxford University Press; 2012. ISBN: 9780199583164.
Burkhardt R. Patterns of Behavior. University of Chicago Press; 2005. ISBN: 9780226082161.
İstanbul Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Enstitüsü. Tarihçe. 2023. Available from: https://adlitip.istanbul.edu.tr/tr/
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmî Gazete. Adli Tıp Kurumu Kanunu (No. 2659). 1953. Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/
Biernoff S. Medical humanities and the visual culture of forensic evidence. Med Humanit. 2023;49(4):322–335. doi:10.1136/medhum-2022-012789
Barker P. Madame Bovary and the arsenic death scene. Nineteenth Century French Stud. 2017;45(3–4):202–218.
Meyer B. Psychopathology and the double: Dostoevsky’s Raskolnikov. J Hist Behav Sci. 2020;56(4):315–327. doi:10.1002/jhbs.22054
Baldick C. Frankenstein and the reconfiguration of death. Stud Romanticism. 2018;57(1):55–74.
Franklin J. Anatomy of a Murder: forensic realism and cinematic truth. Screen. 2014;55(2):189–205. doi:10.1093/screen/hju012
Biernoff S. What can art history offer medical humanities? Med Humanit. 2024;50(1):14–25. doi:10.1136/medhum-2023-012890
Punter D. The Literature of the Gothic. London: Routledge; 2019. ISBN: 9780415355652.
Bülow J, Lahlum S. Visualizing trauma: the aesthetics of forensic digitality. Art Health J. 2023;12(1):45–59.
Miranda MD. The trace in the technique: observation in art connoisseurship and forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synergy. 2021;3:100203. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100203
Waldby C. The Visible Human Project and the ethics of anatomical representation. New Genet Soc. 2000;19(3):275–292. doi:10.1080/713687616
Wilkinson CM. Forensic Facial Reconstruction. Cambridge Univ Press; 2016. ISBN: 9780521768627.
Nocerino E, Palma G, Remondino F. 3D reconstruction for cultural heritage and forensic visualization. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit. 2020;17:12–23. doi:10.1016/j.daach.2020.00123
Sidler M, et al. Postmortem CT and MRI: visualization and forensic potential. Forensic Imaging. 2022;29:200463. doi:10.1016/j.fri.2022.200463
Charlier P, et al. Ethics in forensic anthropology and artistic reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;316:110490. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110490
Jones DG. Art, anatomy, and ethics: interdisciplinary observation of the human body. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(5):525–534. doi:10.1002/ase.1886
Türkcan A. Adli bilimlerde dijital görselleştirme ve etik temsil. Adli Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;22(2):85–94. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jforensci/issue/79388/1291072
Hasçelikoğlu KN, Feyzoğlu TE. Sanatta Tıp Konusuna Yaklaşım ve Çağdaş Seramik Sanatından Örnekler. Sanat Yazıları. 2024;(51):580–598. doi:10.61742/sanatyazilari.1536572
Ahmed M, et al. Digital autopsy: the evolution of virtual postmortem imaging. Forensic Imaging. 2023;31:200492. doi:10.1016/j.fri.2023.200492
Schultheiss D. 3D modelling in medical humanities and forensic visualization. Med Humanit. 2022;48(3):288–302. doi:10.1136/medhum-2021-012800
Medina C. The art of Teresa Margolles and the aesthetics of death. Oxford Art J. 2020;43(1):83–97. doi:10.1093/oxartj/kcaa004
Yoldas P. An Ecosystem of Excess. MIT Press; 2019. ISBN: 9780993232315.
Skloot R. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks and visualizing forensic justice. Med Humanit. 2021;47(2):175–184. doi:10.1136/medhum-2020-012104
Arenberg IK, Di Maio VJM, Baden MM. Reevaluation of the death of Vincent van Gogh. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2020;41(4):291–298. doi:10.1097/PAF.0000000000000595
Smith A, Bhugra D, Liebrenz M. Vincent van Gogh’s ear and the sociocultural iconography of mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023;57(6):780–782. doi:10.1177/00048674231166890
Arnold WN. Vincent van Gogh: Chemicals, Crises and Creativity. Boston: Birkhäuser; 1992. ISBN: 9781461277422. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2976-6
Krier L, Arenberg IK. Vincent van Gogh: suicidal profile assessment. Int J Forens Sci. 2023;8(1):000289. doi:10.23880/ijfsc-16000371
Silva AM, Bragança MJ, Cardoso HF. Lead poisoning as a cause of Caravaggio’s death. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;194(1–3):e17–e21. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.002
Grimberg S. Frida Kahlo: Pain and Passion. Merrell; 2008. ISBN: 9781858944521.
Walther I. Egon Schiele: The Complete Paintings 1909–1918. Taschen; 2013. ISBN: 9783836526722.
Meshberger FL. Interpretation of Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam based on neuroanatomy. JAMA. 1990;264(14):1837–1841. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450140059034
Taylor M. Pollock’s chemistry: toxic materials and the aesthetics of risk. Art Hist J. 2021;44(4):599–618. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12635
Gill J. The forensic mind of Sylvia Plath: self-harm and poetic pathology. J Med Humanit. 2020;41(2):183–194. doi:10.1007/s10912-019-09574-3
Saunders N, Charlier P. Bioarchaeology and the body in modern art: from Kahlo to van Gogh. Med Humanit. 2023;49(3):211–223. doi:10.1136/medhum-2022-012788
Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Oesterhelweg L, Ross S, Dirnhofer R. Virtopsy—The Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;322:110755. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110755
Ebert LC, Flach PM, Thali MJ. Forensic 3D documentation: Object scanning and surface reconstruction. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(2):345–352. doi:10.1007/s00414-018-1895-9
Carew RM, Errickson D. Imaging in forensic science: five years on. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2020;22:200361. doi:10.1016/j.jofri.2020.200361
52.Errickson D, Thompson TJU. Human remains in digital spaces: ethical challenges in 3D visualization. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;338:111394. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111394.
Grabherr S, Egger C, Vilarino R, Campana L, Jotterand M, Dedouit F. Modern post-mortem imaging: an update on recent advances. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2017;26:17–27. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2017.02.002
Ebert LC, Hatch GM. AI-assisted forensic imaging and reconstruction. Forensic Imaging. 2023;33:200512. doi:10.1016/j.fri.2023.200512
Shamata B, Jackowski C, Thali MJ, Grabherr S. Postmortem CT angiography: state-of-the-art. Radiology. 2019;290(3):676–692. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182228
Saunders C, Treadaway C. Digital materiality: crafting the virtual body. Digital Creativity. 2020;31(1):21–37. doi:10.1080/14626268.2020.1715685
Grabherr S, Baumann P, Minoiu C, Fahrni S, Mangin P. Advances in virtopsy technologies and workflow. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021;50:101879. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101879
Williams R. Forensic aesthetics and the digital corpse: an ethical framework. Med Humanit. 2022;48(4):412–420. doi:10.1136/medhum-2021-012821
Cattaneo C, Ritz-Timme S. The future of forensic anthropology: challenges of accuracy and ethics in the digital age. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;316:110500. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110500
Kettner M, Schmidt P, Potente S, Ramsthaler F. 3D surface scanning of trauma patterns: applications in forensic medicine. Int J Legal Med. 2022;136(5):1485–1494. doi:10.1007/s00414-022-02832-8
Madea B. Estimation of the time since death. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;257:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.017
Vanezis P. Interpreting post-mortem changes. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;76(2):91–104. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(95)01732-0
Saukko P, Knight B. Knight’s Forensic Pathology. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.
Spitz WU, Spitz DJ. Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. 5th ed. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 2020.
Robinson C, Giannakopoulos G. Ethical visualization of injury and death in art–science collaborations. Leonardo. 2023;56(1):45–53. doi:10.1162/leon_a_02211
Morley J, Torres D. Digitised death: ethics of representing the dead in virtual environments. Death Stud. 2021;45(7):561–572. doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1701148
Williams R. Forensic aesthetics and the digital corpse: ethical considerations in virtual reconstruction. Med Humanit. 2022;48(4):412–420. doi:10.1136/medhum-2021-012821

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Pelin Erol
