A Survey for Informed Consent Before Surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.200162455Keywords:
informed consent, medical malpractice, forensic scienceAbstract
Between 20 March-01 May 2001, the operated patients in General Surgery Departments of the Social Insurance Society, State and University hospitals in Sivas were applied the poll for evaluation of informed consent pre-operation. 89 cases in Social Insurance Society hospital, 96 cases in University hospital, 167 cases in State hospital of total 352 cases were applied the poll questions face to face. 44 (12.5 %) cases, most of which were younger than 18 old years or emergency cases, were not taken informed consent pre-operation. 23 (52.3 %) cases of these ones were from University hospital. All cases in Social Insurance Society hospital were taken consent pre-operation. 5.2 % of the cases in University hospital, 7.2 % of the cases in State hospital were not taken consent pre-operation. In this study, the problems about the taken informed consent pre-operation being legal neçessity were pointed out. The treatment manner in such cases was suggested.
Key Words: Informed consent, medical malpractice, forensic science
Downloads
References
Hasta Haklan Yönetmeliği. 1 Ağustos 1998 Tarih ve 23420 Sayılı Resmi Gazete. 67-76.
Hancı İH. Hekimin Yasal Sorumlulukları ve Hakları (Tıp ve Sağlık Hukuku). 2. Baskı. İzmir: Toprak Ofset Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti., 1999: 268-88.
Hot İ, Toprak N, Değer M. Cerrahi uygulamalarda hastaların durum değerlendirmesine ait bir anket çalışması. In: Hatemi H, Doğan H, eds. Medikal Etik İlkeler ve Sorunlar. İstanbul: Yüce Yayım, 2000: 115-24.
Arda B. Tıp Etiği Araştırmaları. Ankara: Öncü Matbaası, 1999: 45-50.
Erdemir AD. Tıbbi Deontoloji ve Genel Tıp Tarihi. Bursa: Güneş ve Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 1996: 31-43.
Soysal Z, Çakalır C. Adli Tıp. Cilt: 1. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları, 1999: 51- 71.
Işık AF. Acil Durumlarda Adli Tıp Sorunları. In: Kadayıf- çı A, Karaaslan Y, Köroğlu E. Acil Durumlarda Tanı ve Tedavi. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği, 1999: 439-512.
Köprülü Ö. Hekimin hukuki sorumluluğu. İstanbul Barosu Dergisi 1984; 10-12: 598.
Aykaç M. Adli Tıp. 2. baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 1993:24-6.
Özen C. Adli Tıp. 8. baskı. İstanbul: Taş Matbaası, 1983:14-6.
TTB-ATUD. 1. Basamak İçin Adli Tıp El Kitabı. 1.baskı. Ankara: Polat Matbaası, 1999:13-4.
Bhatt AD. Drug-related problems and adverse drug events: negligence, litigation and prevention. J Assoc Physicians India 1999; 47(7):715-20.
Elmas İ, Tüzün B, Aşıcıoğlu F, İnce H. Acil tedavi basamağındaki yetersizlikler ve hekim hataları: 5 olgu sunumu. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 1998; 61(2):232-6.
Bartlett EE, Holman Kl, Bobetic K, Douglas M, Johnson L, Molchnowski G, Rehmar MI. The early diagnosis project: a collaborative to risk management. J Health Risk Manag 1999; 19(l):21-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.5600190106
Lichtstein DM, Materson BJ, Spicer DW. Reducing the risk of malpractice claims. Hosp Pract 1999; 15;34(7):69-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3810/hp.1999.07.152
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2001 Fatma Yücel Beyaztaş- Özgür Demirkan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
