Diagnostic and Judicial Process Problems in Young Incest Cases Three Case Reports

Authors

  • Saniye Korkmaz , Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı
  • Serpil Erermiş , Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Psikiyatrisi Anabilim Dalı
  • Müge Tamar , Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Psikiyatrisi Anabilim Dalı
  • Cahide Aydın , Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Psikiyatrisi Anabilim Dalı
  • Ayşe Kayahan , Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Psikiyatrisi Anabilim Dalı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.200162456

Keywords:

child, incest, judicial process

Abstract

Incest refers to the sexual abuse of a child by another family member. It is rarely reported in spite of its prevalence. Incest forces dynamic and social changes for family as well as for the child. Referrals to the child psychiatry clinics are judicial in common. The reporting procedure may be influenced not only by the mental and emotional developmental characteristics of the child but also by the family. The aim of this study is to discuss the difficulties of medicolegal reporting process of three cases who had been admitted with an alleged incest history and to suggest standard criteria for these reports. Case a is a 5,5 year-old girl with an history of alleged father-daughter incest, case B is a 5,5 year-old boy with a similar history and case C is a 4 year-old girl with a history of alleged stepfather incest. We report the social, demographic data as well as, family characterictics, present psychiatric state, psychometric examinations and, follow- up results of these three cases in order to discuss the diagnosis and judicial process. We suggest that similar studies should be carried out by multidisciplinary teams.

Key words: Child, incest, judicial process

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kutchinsky B, Çocuğun Cinsel istismarı: Yaygınlık, mü- dahele ve önleme genel bakış. “Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmali içinde”, Çocukların Kötü Muameleden Korunması I. Ulusal Kongresi, Ankara 1990; 201-214.

Bushneil JA, Wells JE, Oakley MA Long-term effects of intrafamilial sexual abuse in childhood. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1992; 85: 136-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb01458.x

Yüksel Ş. Ensestin Tanınması ve Değerlendirilmesi. Nö- ropsikiyatri Arşivi 1993; 30(2): 352-357.

Green AH, Child Sexual Abuse and Incest. In: Lewis M (ed) Child and Adolescent Psychiatry- A Comprehensive Textbook. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company, 1996: 1041-1048.

Hancı İ.H, Hekimim Yasal Sorumlulukları ve Hakları. (Tıp ve Sağlık Hukuku) 2.Basım, İzmir: Toprak Ofset Matbaacılık, 1995: 603-610.

Faller, KC, Criteria for Judging the Credibility of Children’s Statements About Their Sexual Abuse, Children Welfare League of America 1988; 17 (5): 389-399.

Yalın A, Kerimoğlu K, Erhan H Okul Öncesi Çocuklarda Cinsel İstismarı Önleme Programı: Anababaların Tutumu, Görüş ve Davranışlarının Taranması, Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi 1995; 2 (1): 66-72.

Taneli S, Albayrak EC, Sivrioğlu EY, Küçük Çocuğun Cinsel Tacizi ve Tanı Zorlukları. In: Ekşi A(ed)Ben Hasta Değilim, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıklarının Psikososyal Yönü . İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevi, 1999; 531-541.

Yörükoğlu A, Çocuk Ruh Sağlığı, 21.basım İstanbul: Özgür Yayınları, 1997: 60-66.

Yavuzer H, Çocuk Psikolojisi. 14.baskı, İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi, 1997: 87-107.

Topçu S, Çocuk ve Gençlerin Cinsel İstismarı. 2. baskı, İstanbul, Doruk Yayımcılık, 1997: 174-194.

Finkel MA, De Jong AR, Medical Finding in Child Sexual Abuse. In: Reece Rm (ed) Child Abuse Medical Diagnosis and Management, Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1994: 185-284.

Sorenson T, Snow B, How Children Tell: The process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Children Welfare League of America 1991; 70: 3-35.

Soysal Z, Eke M, Çocuklara Karşı İşlenen Cinsel Suçlar, İstanbul. İ.Ü Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fak. Adli Tıp. Cilt IH, 1995: 1219-1228.

Benedek EP, BrownCF. How to Help Your Child Overcome Your Divorce. First published in the United Stated by American Psychatric Press, Inc, Washington D. C. and London. 1995; 28-49.

Türk Ceza Kanunu, 6.baskı, İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi, 1997: 436-447.

Downloads

Published

2001-08-01

Issue

Section

Case Report

How to Cite

1.
Korkmaz S, Erermiş S, Tamar M, Aydın C, Kayahan A. Diagnostic and Judicial Process Problems in Young Incest Cases Three Case Reports. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2001 Aug. 1 [cited 2025 Sep. 7];6(2):81-6. Available from: https://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/456