The Problems Faced by Physicians While Preparing Death Certificates a Survey

Authors

  • Nursel Gamsız Bilgin , Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı
  • Erhan Mert , Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.200381489

Keywords:

death certificate, forensic medicine education, health statistics

Abstract

The data of the death reports and death certificate are used as data base for health statistics. The aim of this study was to determine the problems faced by physicians while completing death certificate, to recommend advices for the solution of this kind of problems and to stress the importance of this topic in education programmes either before or after graduation. Physicians of the Mersin University Medical Faculty Hospital were asked to complete the Questionnare with 14 open ended questions. Of 200 physicians who took questionnare, 87%(n=174) completed it. Of physicians who completed questionnare, 89.1% (n= 155) stated that they were completing death certificate for the permission of burial 70.7% of them thought that death certificate had to be completed by the physician who ascertained death and 71.84% of them stated that they had problems while completing these certificate. 51.1% of the physicians thought that the main underlying cause of death had to be written as the death cause, but %86.8 of the physicians stated that they did not use International Classification of Diseases (ICD). 93.1% of the physicians took lectures for the training of forensic medicine. In conclusion; it is very important to complete death certificate by writing underlying main cause of death according to the Intenational Classification of Diseases for maintaining accurate health statistical data and it is also important to put lessons regarding the procedures after death in the education programmes either before or after graduation

Key words: Death certificate, forensic medicine education, health statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vehid S, Koksal S, Aran SN, Kaypmaz A, Sipahioğlu F, Özbal AN. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesinde 1998 Yılında Meydana Gelen Ölümlerin Dağılımının İncelenmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 2000; 31 (1): 16-22.

Koç S, Yorulmaz C. Hekimin Yasal sorumlulukları. Adli Tıp, Cilt I (Editörler: Soysal Z. Çakalır C). İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 1999:48-49.

UHK. Kanun metinleri dizisi. Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara 2001.

CMUK. Kanun metinleri dizisi. Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara 2001.

Hancı İH. Hekimlerin Yasal Sorumlulukları (Tıbbi Hukuk), Ölülerin Defni. Eğem Yayıncılık, 1995;69-73.

Ölü Defin Ruhsatları Hakkında Genelge T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Sayı: BlOOtshO 100005 Ankara Konu: Ölü Defin Ruhsatları 01.05.2000, 5852, Genelge, 2000/41.

http://www.saglik.gov.tr/default.asp?sayfa=detay&id=959. 2004

Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R., Kjellström, T.: Basic Epidemiology, World Health Organization, Geneva 1993.21.

Davis GG. Mind Your Manners. Part I: History of Death Certification and Manner of Death Classification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol USA 1997; 18: 219-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199709000-00001

Çolak B, Yaycı N, İnanıcı MA. Türkiye’de Mezuniyet Öncesi Adli Tıp Eğitimini Durumu. Yıllık Adli Tıp Toplantıları, 25-27 Nisan 2001, Program kitabı: 26.

Fincancı ŞK. Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Adli Tıp Eğitimi. I Adli Bilimler Kongresi, Adana 12-15 Nisan 1994, Kongre kitabı: 52-54.

Salaçin S, Tuncer İ, Erkoçak EU. Türkiye’de Mezuniyet Öncesi ve Mezuniyet Sonrası Adli Tıp Eğitiminin Sorunları. Adli Tıp Dergisi, 1993;9(l-4);17-22.

Downloads

Published

2003-04-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Bilgin NG, Mert E. The Problems Faced by Physicians While Preparing Death Certificates a Survey. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2003 Apr. 1 [cited 2025 Sep. 7];8(1):15-9. Available from: https://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/489