Evaluation of Hospital Education Environment Perceptions of Forensic Medicine Residents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1478Keywords:
Forensic medicine residency, Postgraduate medical education, Clinical training environmentAbstract
Background: The learning environment is key to successful education. By evaluating learning environment, strong parts and parts that need improvement of education process can be revealed. Various scales have been developed in order to evaluate issue. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate educational environments of two different departments of forensic medicine [Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine (PAUFM) and Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine (HUFM)] using a standard scale, compare the differences and investigate the reasons.
Materials and Methods: First, resident participating in university were asked demographic information about their university, gender and academic year. Second, Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) was applied. The distribution and scores for the items and subtitles were calculated.
Results: Total score of the participants was 131.85 (±22.93) (perfect education environment), perception of professional autonomy subgroup mean score 46.61 (±8.04) (excellent), perception of education subgroup mean score 50.91 (±8.71) (excellent) and social support perception subgroup mean score was 34.32 (±7.11) (environment that supports learning). When scores were compared between two departments, it was observed that mean scores of HUFM were significantly higher.
Conclusion: Our study is the first study in which educational environments of residents who are trained in forensic medicine are evaluated. It was determined that average scores obtained in both departments are higher than other studies conducted in different specialties in our country. It has been demonstrated that PHEEM can be used to identify and correct the problems in forensic specialty training environment and to increase quality of forensic specialty training.
Downloads
References
Yılmaz, N.D. Tıp Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme İklimi Algılarının; Akademik öz yeterlik, hekimlik mesleğine yönelik tutum ve akademik başarı açısından incelenmesi (Doktora Tezi). İzmir, Ege Üniversitesi; 2010.
Balkan A. Hemşirelik yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin klinik öğrenme iklimi algılarının akademik başarıya etkisinin değerlendirilmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi; 2015.
Roff S, McAleer S. What is educational climate? Med Teach. 2001;23(4):333-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120063312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120063312
Yılmaz ND. Mezuniyet sonrası tıp eğitiminde: Öğrenme ortamı ve öğrenme iklimi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Educ-Special Topics 2016;1:1-7.
Kara CO, Gürpınar E. Ters yüz sınıf uygulamasında klinik öğrenme ikliminin değerlendirilmesi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2018; 17(53), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.433132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.433132
Zeybek V, Acar K, Kurtuluş Dereli A, Kara CO. Yapılandırılmış senaryo eşliğinde maket üzerinde adli ölü muayenesi eğitiminin değer¬lendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2018; 23, 6- 12. doi: 10.17986/blm.2018136913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2018136913
Terzi C. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Tıpta Uzmanlık Eğitimi, I. Tıpta Uzmanlık Eğitimi Programlama Uygulama Değerlendirme Çalıştayı Eğitim Notları, TTB UDEK UYEK, 5-10 Kasım 2004 Ankara; 2004.
WFME. Quality Improvement In Postgraduate Medical Education: Task Force On Defining International Standards In Postgraduate Medical Education, Report Of The Working Party. Copenhagen; 2001.
Balcıoğlu H. Tıpta uzmanlık öğrencilerinin eğitim ortamı algılamaları ve buna etkili faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi;2008.
Atılgan B, Taşdelen Teker G, Sezer S, Yeşiltepe M, Odabaşı O. HÜTF’nde tıpta uzmanlık öğrencilerinin klinik eğitim ortamlarına ilişkin algılarının değerlendirilmesi. STED/Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi. 2020; 29(1), 44-53. DOI:10.17942/sted.617927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17942/sted.617927
Genn JM. AMEE medical education guide no. 23 (part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education a unifying perspective. Medical Teacher 2001;23(4):337- 344. DOI: 10.1080/01421590120063330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120063330
Mohanna K, Cottrell E, Chambers R, Wall D, editors. Teaching made easy: a manual for health professionals. 3rd ed. Radcliffe Publishing; 2011.
Harden RM, editör. Educational Environment. A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th Ed. Elsevier; 2011.
Aktaş EÖ. Adli tıp uzmanlık eğitimi gelişmeler ve değişiklikler. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2015; 20(3). doi: 10.17986/blm.2015314254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2015314254
Roff S, McAleer S, Skinner A. Development and validation of an instrument to measure the postgraduate clinical learning and teaching educational environment for hospital-based junior doctors in the UK. Medical Teacher. 2005; 27, 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500150874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500150874
Sezi̇k M, Savran M, Kara CO, Ali̇moğlu M. Assessment of hospital educational environment perceptions of obstetrics and gynecology residents in specialty and subspecialty training. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2020; 64-75. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.593420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.593420
Kasap H, Akar T, Demirel B, Dursun AZ, Sarı S, Özkök A, Aydemir Önder. Tıbbi uygulama hatası riski yüksek olan uzmanlık dallarının tıpta uzmanlık sınavında tercih edilme önceliklerinin yıllara göre değişimi. Adli Tıp Bülteni. 2015; 20(1), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2015110917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2015110917
Chan CYW, Sum MY, Lim WS, Chew NWM, Samarasekera DD, Sim K. Adoption and correlates of Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) in the evaluation of learning environments– A systematic review, Medical Teacher. 2016; 38:12, 1248-1255. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1210108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1210108
Flaherty GT, Connolly R, O’Brien T. Measurement of the postgraduate educational environment of junior doctors training in medicine at an Irish university teaching hospital. Ir J Med Sci. 2016; 185, 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1303-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1303-8
Sarıkaya S, Kadıoğlu A. TÜAK/Türkiye ESRU Asistan El Kitabı. 2. Baskı. İstanbul, Türk Üroloji Derneği; 2017.
Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı Asistan El Kitabı;2019-2020. http://anestiyoloji.medicine.ankara.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/770/2015/11/Asistan-El-Kitabi-2019-2020.pdf
Camargo A, Liu L, Yousem DM. Sexual harassment in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(8):1094–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.054
Chrysafi P, Simou E, Makris M, Malietzis G, Makris GC. Bullying and sexual discrimination in the Greek health care system. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(4):690–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.005
Kerr H, Armstrong L, Cade J. Barriers to becoming a female surgeon and the influence of female surgical role models. Postgr Med J. 2016;92(1092):576–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133273
Young-Shumate L, Kramer T, Beresin E. Pregnancy during graduate medical training. Acad Med. 1993;68(10):792–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199310000-00019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199310000-00019
Garrison CB. The lonely only: Physician reflections on race, bias, and residency program leadership. Fam Med. 2019;51(1):59–60. DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.339526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.339526
Eyigör H, Can İH, İncesulu A, Şenol Y. Women in otolaryngology in Turkey: Insight of gender equality, career development and work-life balance. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2020; 41(1), 102305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102305
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Bulletin of Legal Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
