Examination of Opinions and Attitudes about Forensic DNA Database: Medical Students, Forensic Medicine Doctors and Clinical Geneticists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1699Keywords:
forensic dna database, forensic medicine, physician, genetic, questionnaireAbstract
Objective: In this study, it is aimed to evaluate forensic medicine and genetics specialists and residents, medical students and genetics PhD students’ opinions on purpose, management and use of data of the forensic DNA database and their perspectives on the bank.
Methods: In this study, an online survey application was preferred. Five hundred sixty-eight questionnaires were evaluated, including 354 medical students, 73 forensic medicine specialists, 98 forensic medicine residents, 14 genetics specialists, 24 genetics residents, and 5 genetics PhD students. In the survey; sociodemographic characteristics, professional characteristics, opinions about which institution should manage if a forensic DNA bank is established in our country, whose information will be stored, and positive aspects and concerns about the database were asked.
Results: 46.7% of the participants were female and 53.3% were male. The mean age was 25.88±8.20 years. Approximately 50% of the participants stated that the DNA information of convicts, suspects, and volunteers should be kept. It was determined that positive opinions were at a higher level than concerns. It was observed that the anxiety levels of the medical faculty students were higher than the other participants. It was found that the level of anxiety decreased as the age increased.
Conclusion: It is necessary to support the questions in our study, which sheds light on the general attitude about DNA bank for forensic purposes, with samples reflecting the society.
References
Gill P. DNA evidence and miscarriages of justice. Forensic Science International. 2019;294:1-3.
Çoğulu Ö. Tıbbi genetik laboratuvar ve klinik. Ankara: Ankara Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2017.
Yükseloğlu EH, Celbiş O. Adli bilimlerde Adli Tıp ve adli genetik uygulamaları. Ankara: Akademisyen Yayınevi; 2021.
Wienroth M, Morling N, Williams R. Technological innovations in forensic genetics: social, legal and ethical aspects. Recent Adv DNA Gene Seq Former Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2014;8(2):98-103.
Machado H, Silva S. What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence. Hum Genomics. 2019;13(1):23.
Interpol. Global DNA profiling survey results. 2019. Erişim adresi: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/15469/file/INTERPOL%20Global%20DNA%20Profiling%20Survey%20Results%202019.pdf Erişim tarihi: 29.03.2022.
DNA Verileri ve Milli DNA Veri Bankası Kanunu Tasarısı. Erişim adresi: https://www.ttb.org.tr/haberarsiv_goster.php?Guid=665acfee-9232-11e7-b66d-1540034f819c Erişim tarihi: 22.02.2022.
Teodorović S, Mijović D, Radovanović Nenadić U, Savić M. Attitudes regarding the national forensic DNA database: Survey data from the general public, prison inmates and prosecutors’ offices in the Republic of Serbia. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;28:44-51.
Uberoi D, Palmour N, Joly Y. The advent of forensic DNA databases: It’s time to agree on some international governance principles! Forensic Sci Int Genet. 01 Eylül 2024;72:103095.
Miller S, Smith M. Quasi-Universal Forensic DNA Databases. Criminal Justice Ethics. 2022;41(3), 238-256.
Machado H, Silva S. “Would you accept having your DNA profile inserted in the national forensic DNA database? Why?” Results of a questionnaire applied in Portugal. Forensic Sci Int Genet. Ocak 2014;8(1):132-6.
Guerrini CJ, Robinson JO, Petersen D, McGuire AL. Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique. PLOS Biol. 2018;16(10):e2006906.
Zeye MMJ, Ouedraogo SY, Millogo M, Djigma FW, Zoure AA, Zeba M, vd. Forensic DNA database and criminal investigation in the Sahel region: a need to update the national security policy? Forensic Sci Res [İnternet]. 01 Haziran 2024 [a.yer 17 Eylül 2024];9(2). Erişim adresi: https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owad056
Tatar G. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Hafsa Sultan Hastanesi’nde görev yapan hekimlerin adli DNA bankası oluşturulması konusuna bakış Açıları. Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Sunay Yavuz. Manisa: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, 2016.
Del Real Á, Sáenz-Aldea M, Santurtún A, Zarrabeitia MT. Forensic databases, a perspective from the penitentiary centers of Spain. Sci Justice. 2021;61(2):175-9.
Fovargue S, Bennett R. What role should public opinion play in ethico-legal decision making? The example of selecting sex for non-medical reasons using preimplantation genetıc dıagnosıs. Med Law Rev. 2016;24(1):34-58.
Samuel G, Howard HC, Cornel M, El C van, Hall A, Forzano F, vd. A response to the forensic genetics policy initiative’s report “establishing best practice for forensic DNA databases”. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;36:19-21.
Tozzo P, Fassina A, Caenazzo L. Young people’s awareness on biobanking and DNA profiling: results of a questionnaire administered to Italian university students. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2017;13:9.
Samuel G, Kennett D. Problematizing consent: searching genetic genealogy databases for law enforcement purposes. New Genet Soc. 2021;40(3):284-304.
Zieger M, Utz S. About DNA databasing and investigative genetic analysis of externally visible characteristics: a public survey. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;17:163-72.
Mohanty A, Chhabra N, Sharma A, Kaur H. DNA banking, its current awareness and national status in biomedical research in India, a survey. Cell Tissue Bank. 2021;1-9.
Smith JH, Horne JS. Establishing forensic DNA databases in Africa. Forensic Sci Res [İnternet]. 01 Haziran 2024 [a.yer 17 Eylül 2024];9(2). Erişim adresi: https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae024
Gamero JJ, Romero JL, Peralta JL, Real FC, Guillén M, Anjos MJ. A study of Spanish attitudes regarding the custody and use of forensic DNA databases. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008;2(2):138-49.
Amankwaa AO. Forensic DNA retention: public perspective studies in the United Kingdom and around the world. Sci Justice. 2018;58(6):455-64.
Santurtún A, Lema C, Zarrabeitia MT. Fundamental rights regarding forensic databases: review and analysis of Kuwait’s law 78/2015. Span J Leg Med. 2017;43(2):79-86.
Da Silva Junior RC, Wirz LN, Solares Reyes E, Del Moral Stevenel MA. Development of DNA databases in Latin America. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;316:110540.
Ata U, Çelik C, Saka NE. Kahramanmaraş Deprem Felaketi Kurbanlarında Kimliklendirmenin Gözlemsel İncelenmesi. İçinde 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27573.04323
Voultsos P, Njau S, Tairis N, Psaroulis D, Kovatsi L. Launching the Greek forensic DNA database. The legal framework and arising ethical issues. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011;5(5):407-10.
Voss G. Report to the human genetics commission on public attitudes to the uses of human genetic information. Hum Genet Comm. 2000.
Machado H, Santos F, Silva S. Prisoners’ expectations of the national forensic DNA database: surveillance and reconfiguration of individual rights. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;210(1):139-43.
Pivetti M, Caggiano A, Cieri F, Battista SD, Berti C. Support for the forensic DNA database and public safety concerns: an exploratory study. Open Psychol J. 2017;10(1):104-17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Bulletin of Legal Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
