Difficult Decision on Tyroid Surgery of Expert Witness: Complication or Malpractice
Objective: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis and hypocalcemia following thyroid surgery have been designated as complication or malpractice. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate surgeons’ opinions towards RLN injury and hypocalcemia after bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy (BST) and total thyroidectomy (TT) in nodular goiter and thyroid carcinoma.
Materials and Methods: We prepared a questionnaire to determine approaches of surgeons in such cases. We grouped the respondents according their thyroid surgery experiments and asked them to determine whether it is malpractice or complication in cases with unilateral or bilateral RLN paralysis and hypocalcemia after “bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy” and in cases with unilateral or bilateral RLN paralysis after “total thyroidectomy”.
Results: In all groups describing bilateral RLN injury was more common. Problems which are defined as “complication” in cancer patients, were more likely defined as “malpractice” in benign cases. However, these differences were generally not statistically significant.
Conclusion: There is no consensus about malpractice and complication discrimination among physicians. Every physician should evaluate every specific case in its own nature and conditions when asked to determine whether the case should be determined as complication or malpractice.
2. Schulte KM, Röher H. [Medico-legal aspects of thyroid surgery]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. 1999;70(10):1131-8. DOI: 10.1007/s001040050
3. Wagner H, Seiler C. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroid gland surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 1994;81(2):226-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810222
4. Kern KA, Hartford C. Medicolegal analysis of errors in and treatment of surgical endocrine. Surgery. 1993; 114(6):1167-1174
5. Curić Radivojević R, Prgomet D, Markešić J, Ezgeta C. Hypocalcaemia after Thyroid Surgery for Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Preliminary Study Report. Collegium Antropologicum. 2013;36(2):73-8.
6. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. Jama. 2001;286(4):415-20. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.4.415
7. American Collage of Surgeons. Statement on the physician acting as an expert witness. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2004;199(5):746-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.07.015
8. Kunin CM. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100(1):139-143. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-139
9. Bal BS. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2009;467(2):383-91. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0634-4
10. Commons ML, Gutheil TG, Hilliard JT. On humanizing the expert witness: A proposed narrative approach to expert witness qualification. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online. 2010;38(3):302-4.
Copyright (c) 2017 Ali Rıza Tümer, Mahmut Şerif Yıldırım, Savaş Koçak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine is an open access scientific journal. Open access means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine requires the author as the rights holder to sign and submit the journal's agreement form prior to acceptance. The authors retain copyright of their work and grant the Association for its publication. This ensures both that The Journal has the right to publish the article and that the author has confirmed various things including that it is their original work and that it is based on valid research.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
*Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.