An Example of Multidisciplinary Approach in the Medicolegal Evaluation of Cases Applying to the Forensic Medicine Polyclinic: Forensic Medicine and Radiology Joint Study Model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1734

Keywords:

forensic medicine, radiology, multidisciplinary

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of radiological images is frequently required in preparing a forensic report that requires multidisciplinary evaluation of cases. The aim of the councils that we organized with the joint participation of Forensic Medicine and Radiology was to emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary cooperation between the disciplines of forensic medicine and radiology for the professional and accurate evaluation of radiological findings and to present this approach as a model by considering the cases evaluated.

Methods: Archive records between January 2019 and July 2022 were scanned, and the reports evaluated by our forensic medicine and radiology councils were evaluated in terms of age, gender, report type, pathologies evaluated in the council, and medicolegal results.

Results: In our study, 266 cases were evaluated. It is seen that 57.1% (n=152) of the cases were trauma cases. Osseous pathologies constitute 54.9% (n=129) of the traumatic cases. The other 106 cases consisted of regional injuries and it was observed that thoracic (48.1%) and cranial pathologies (30.1%) were evaluated most frequently. In regional injuries, lung contusion and intracranial haemorrhages were frequently evaluated.

Conclusion: We believe that evaluating radiological images affecting forensic medical evaluation together with forensic medicine and radiology specialists from a forensic medicine perspective and reaching a conclusion is important regarding forensic reporting and results. Therefore, we recommend the establishment of joint councils of the Forensic Medicine and Radiology Departments as a model to discuss cases that require the evaluation of a radiologist during the forensic medical evaluation process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mahesh M, Ansari AJ, Mettler FA. Patient Exposure from Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Proce-dures in the United States and Worldwide: 2009-2018. Radiology. 2023;307(1):e221263.s://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.239006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.239006

Türk Ceza Kanunu [İnternet]. [cited 01 Sep 2024]. Available from: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.5237.pdf

Tıbbi Deontoloji Nizannamesi [İnternet]. [cited 05 Nov 2024]. Available from: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/2.3.412578.pdf

Emet M, Saritas A, Acemoglu H, Aslan S, Cakir Z. Predictors of missed injuries in hospitalized trauma patients in the emergency department. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36(6):559-66.s://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-0018-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-0018-9

Stanescu L, Talner LB, Mann FA. Diagnostic errors in polytrauma: a structured review of the recent literature. Emerg Radiol. 2006;12(3):119-23.s://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0436-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0436-x

Şener MT, Kök AN. Adli Tıp Pratiğinde Konsültasyon. Adli Tıp Bül. 2011;16(3):77-80.s://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2011163729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2011163729

Yargıtay 14. Ceza Dairesi. 2012;Karar no: 2012/8955.

Koç A. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalında 2013-2022 Yılları Arasında Kemik Yaşı Tespiti Amacıyla Muayene Edilen Hastaların Medikolegal Değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi; 2024.

Demirkıran S, Çelikel A, Zeren C, Arslan MM. Methods for age estimation. Dicle Med JournalDicle Tıp Derg. 2014;41(1):238-43.s://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2014.01.0410

Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Am J Med Sci. 1959;238(3):393.s://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-195909000-00030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-195909000-00030

Gilsanz V, Ratib O. Hand Bone Age: A Digital Atlas of Skeletal Maturity [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012 [cited 01 Sep 2024]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-23762-1s://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23762-1

Gök Ş, Erölçer N, Özen Ç. Adli Tıpta yaş tayini. Adli Tıp Kurumu Yayın. 1985;

Reddy NE, Rayan JC, Annapragada AV, Mahmood NF, Scheslinger AE, Zhang W, et al. Bone age de-termination using only the index finger: a novel approach using a convolutional neural network compared with human radiologists. Pediatr Radiol. 2020;50(4):516-23.s://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04587-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04587-y

Şener MT, Polat Ş. Adli yaş tahmini yapılan olguların değerlendirilmesi: retrospektif bir çalışma. KSU Med J. 2020;15(2):1-6.s://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.664337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.664337

Atılgan M, Akkoyun M. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalından Yaş Tayini İstenen Olguların Değerlendirilmesi. Bull Leg Med. 2017;22(1):34-9.s://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2017127139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.2017127139

Karabakır B. Adli Olguların Canlıda Yaş Tayini Açısından İncelenmesi. (Doktora Tezi). [İstanbul]: İstan-bul Üniversitesi Adli Tıp Enstitüsü; 2015.

Seviner M, Kozacı N, Ay MO, Açikalın A, Çökük A, Acehan S, et al. Acil Tıp Kliniğine Başvuran Adli Va-kaların Geriye Dönük Analizi. Cukurova Med J. 2013;38.

Özdemir AA, Elgörmüş Y, Yakup Ç. Acil servise gelen adli nitelikli çocuk olguların değerlendirilmesi. Int J Basic Clin Med [Internet]. 2016 [cited 02 Sep 2024];4(1). Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijbcm/issue/24466/259347

Demir ÖF, Aydin K, Turan F, Yurtseven A, Erbil B, Gülalp B. Acil servise başvuran çocuk adli olguların analizi. Türk Pediatri Arş. 2013;48(3):235-40.s://doi.org/10.4274/tpa.266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/tpa.266

Sever M, Saz EU, Koşargelir M. Bir üçüncü basamak hastane acil servisine başvuran adli nitelikli çocuk hastaların değerlendirilmesi. 2010;16(3):260-7.

Kavakli U. Travmalı Olgularda Radyolojik Tanının Medikolegal Değerlendirilmesi. dokuz eylül üniver-sitesi;

Ayaz N, Meral O, Doğan M. The Importance of Radiology Consultation in Forensic Report Prepara-tion: A Retrospective Study. Med Rec. 2020;2(3):82-6.s://doi.org/10.37990/medr.779193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.779193

Petinaux B, Bhat R, Boniface K, Aristizabal J. Accuracy of radiographic readings in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(1):18-25.s://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.011

Guly HR. Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001;18(4):263-9.s://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.4.263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.4.263

Downloads

Published

2025-02-23 — Updated on 2025-04-19

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
İzci A, Acar K, Çakmak V, Arslanergül M, Kurtuluş Dereli A. An Example of Multidisciplinary Approach in the Medicolegal Evaluation of Cases Applying to the Forensic Medicine Polyclinic: Forensic Medicine and Radiology Joint Study Model. Bull Leg Med [Internet]. 2025 Apr. 19 [cited 2025 Sep. 6];30(1):38-44. Available from: https://www.adlitipbulteni.com/index.php/atb/article/view/1734